Compound traits
The most complex traits, formed by combining three basic dichotomies. They describe deep life attitudes: towards the future, power, information and other people.
Carefree — Farsighted
Carefreeness ↔ FarsightednessDetermines the attitude to the future: living for today or constantly calculating risks ahead.
Characterises the reliance on past experience when preparing for new tasks. Carefree types treat each situation as unique, solving problems as they actually arise and reluctantly stockpiling algorithms for the future. Farsighted types try to calculate possible scenarios in advance, drawing on the full body of accumulated knowledge and building a surplus base to minimise risk.
Examples
- The carefree person buys on impulse and is happy. The farsighted one studies reviews and waits for discounts.
- The carefree person has no savings — money comes and goes. The farsighted one always sets aside part of their income.
- The carefree person sets off with a one-way ticket. The farsighted one books everything a month ahead.
Демократы — Аристократы
Democracy ↔ AristocracyDetermines how a person relates to social hierarchy and differences between people.
Describes the perception of a person through the prism of their social or group belonging. Aristocrats automatically categorise people by their membership of particular communities, clusters or professional strata, judging the individual through the properties of their group. Democrats perceive each person in isolation, relying on personal qualities and attaching no decisive weight to formal status or origin.
Examples
- The democrat calls the boss by first name and argues as an equal. The aristocrat observes the chain of command.
- The democrat thinks titles and ranks mean nothing. The aristocrat takes pride in achievements and status.
- In company the democrat talks to everyone alike. The aristocrat builds relationships according to the hierarchy.
Declaring — Questioning
Declaring ↔ QuestioningDetermines the communication style: stating one's position or inviting the interlocutor's response.
Reflects the preferred form of communicative exchange. Questioners tend to build dialogue through questions and answers; their speech naturally presupposes a reaction and often sounds like an invitation to discussion. Declarers prefer to speak in weighty monologue blocks, framing thoughts as finished statements that require no immediate confirmation.
Examples
- The declarer says: “This is the best option.” The questioner asks: “Do you like this option?”
- The declarer ends a message with a full stop. The questioner uses an ellipsis or a question mark.
- The declarer takes responsibility and leads. The questioner gathers opinions and seeks consensus.
Субъективизм (весёлые) — Объективизм (серьёзные)
Subjectivism ↔ ObjectivismDetermines how a person weighs information: through personal experience and inner feeling or through external criteria and facts.
Sets the context for understanding rules, norms and interpersonal agreements. Subjectivists are guided by emotional accord and subjective understanding, readily creating local rules within their circle. Objectivists rely on objective facts, generally accepted concepts and logical laws that exist independently of the participants' personal sympathies.
Examples
- Choosing a medicine, the subjectivist listens to their body. The objectivist reads the instructions and the research.
- The subjectivist trusts their intuition more than the crowd's opinion. The objectivist needs evidence.
- In an argument the subjectivist cites their own experience. The objectivist cites sources and authorities.
Рассудительность (периферийные квадры) — Решительность (центральные квадры)
Judiciousness ↔ DecisivenessDetermines how a person divides their energy between weighing options and moving to action.
Reflects the distribution of mobilisation and relaxation in the decision cycle. Judicious types feel at home in the phase of discussion and choosing between options, while the moment of moving to action demands an effort of will. Decisive types experience the choosing stage as discomfort, hurrying to reach the moment of execution and concentrating their forces directly on taking the step.
Examples
- The judicious person weighs the options at length before a purchase. The decisive one takes the first suitable thing and moves on.
- At a meeting the judicious person proposes discussing every scenario. The decisive one insists: time to act.
- The judicious person is comfortable keeping a decision open. The decisive one needs to make it and get to work as soon as possible.